Skip to content
Betcore Digital

Tetris Wouldn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — Another Award Type May Address This Issue

As any major prize-giving event draws close, you'll find a clamor for introducing of new categories to recognize unsung work and satisfy the spirits of followers who have specialized interests.

My colleague previously argued advocating for terror-themed awards. That would rule. The same goes for strategy board titles, this being a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance when I prioritize because like all blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand is the most urgent and important of all. This is the request: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and typically spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why cinema institutions don’t do it. Yet it remains a necessary evil for the industry of interactive entertainment, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of gaming accomplishments to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Prominent interactive entertainment events currently feature genre categories for Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types successfully include numerous genres, and you can find room accommodating various experiences.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. No appropriate category exists to accommodate them. Examine these examples from outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: the architectural riddles in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. What category would fit them within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

Recognition Challenges

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games published annually without proper recognition at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify classification types such as Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated completely during that awards season
  • A different innovative game missed out that year
  • Popular arranging title got ignored that year
  • Only a few brain-teasers barely qualified for independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're compact experiences, but the art of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Famous handheld logic titles count as most engaged experiences globally maintaining this status for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title challenges famous sandbox experiences claiming status as best-selling game of all time; it also contends as greatest title ever. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, while interacting with diverse game types.

The Solution and Justification

Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. You could fill multiple candidates with fascinating, diverse, deserving games every year with ease — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences that otherwise have no home during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers operate at the hard edge game development, creating some of essential manifestations of gaming itself. Just like movie stunt professionals, they warrant appreciation. Don't make them wait 35 years.

JS
About the author

Julia Schmidt

A digital strategist with over 8 years of experience in SEO and content marketing, passionate about data-driven growth.

Betcore Digital

Type to search articles.